What is right? The thought of thinking if this thing is right?
or The Thought that there should not have been a thought of judgement at first?
Thinking of the former, if the thing is right, there should not have been a thought of judging if it is right,
because they say right things are those that come from your heart...
But then from where does the thought of judging that right decision come from.
If the source is same why should there be a conflict?
If the sources are different why should different things be mixed?
The thing is not right.... "right" is just used to bolster the action, decision..
The thing must be looking at us with an eyebrow up, like.. why are you discriminating me from othrs.....
Who gave the power to do that??
If you say you have power to discriminate the things that you have not created neither have control on...is that a right thing?
Yes, it is right to discriminate against such thing, in order to know what is right and what is not.
ReplyDeleteIts the power of righteousness/conscience that enables us to distinguish between right and wrong, and if we did not have that power, would we be able to do so?
If the thing is right, it will pass all righteous judgements with its head held high, and no judgement would be able to belittle a right.
(I hope I am on the right wavelength of arguement. :) )
You have attempted to explain P2C2E!! (Process too complicated to explain from Haroun and the sea of stories, Salman Rushdie). Commendable!Bravo!!Way to go!!!
ReplyDeleteI agree with KG....Plato/Aristotle ko maat dena chah raha hai ye ladka. Gaurang..Lol...again there is no right wavelength for the argument :) and you basically concluded the argument saying knowledge is virtue and discovering it is only right thing to do..everything else is quite hazy....I like it!!
ReplyDelete